Home Economy Bank of Canada is not still sure where interest rates should land

Bank of Canada is not still sure where interest rates should land

by SuperiorInvest

The policy formulators of the Bank of Canada continue to discuss how monetary policy can better support the Canadian economy during a period of world commercial uncertainty, according to the deliberations published on Wednesday.

Some members of the Governing Council said there should be no additional rate relief, since the Canadian economy has shown more resistance and greater flexibility could exacerbate price pressures.

“Companies and consumers were adapting, and the growth in the economy sectors less linked to the commercial actions of the United States could support the general economy, although on a lower path of economic activity,” said the summary. “Given the lagged effects of monetary policy, there was a risk that the decrease in ease only in force only as demand was recovering, which could increase price pressures.”

Others, however, said that a greater relief of the rate given the persistent slack in the Canadian economy is needed and the risk that the labor market can deteriorate even more.

“If the incoming data showed that the upward risks for underlying inflation did not materialize, there could be more space for monetary policy to facilitate even more, reducing economic slack and supporting the adjustment of the economy to the reconfiguration of global trade,” the summary said.

The deliberations were from the meetings of the Bank of Canada that took place from July 22 to the rate of July 30, when the Central Bank chose to maintain its policy rate at 2.75 percent per third consecutive time.

The governor of the Bank of Canada, Tiff Macklem, said that the winery was due to three main reasons: commercial uncertainty continues with the United States, a more resistant Canadian economy and evidence of underlying inflation pressures.

The growth of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the first quarter was better than expected in 2.2 percent, mainly because companies achieve an inventory to overcome fees ads. The Central Bank expects negative growth in the second quarter, but the estimates of the early statistics of Canada suggest that the second quarter is on the way to avoid a contraction.

The unemployment rate has been 6.9 percent in June and July, with yet content, but there has been very little growth of net employment since the beginning of this year.

Macklem left the door open for greater relief of the rate if “a weakening economy exerts lower pressure on inflation and the pressures of ascending prices of commercial interruptions are contained.”

Policy formulators recognized the persistence of the underlying inflation and that the impacts related to the prices rate barely begin, but also said that “there were no signs that inflation expectations had been undone.”

Central inflation measures have been around three percent since April, but uncertainty remains how inflation will evolve in response to interruptions related to the rate.

Due to this uncertainty, the Central Bank decided not to publish a prognosis in its most recent monetary policy report. Instead, he presented three stages: the first used tariffs instead at July 27, the second represented a reduction of rates and the third showed an escalation in the United States rates.

The first scenario expects growth to contract in the second quarter before returning to one percent in the third quarter, as exports stabilize and home spending is strengthened. The growth then collects in 2026 and reaches 1.8 percent in 2027.

In the decalming scenario, GDP grows around two percent in the second half of 2025 and averages 1.7 percent until the end of 2027. Inflation remains below two percent target until the end of 2026.

In the climbing stage, the GDP hires for the rest of 2025, with a slowly growth in the first half of next year. The main inflation increases just above 2.5 percent in the third quarter of 2026.

“Given the uncertainty about the estimates of the underlying and underlying inflation, and how homes, companies and governments will adapt to tariffs, the members agreed that they would have to wait more clarity before drawing firm conclusions,” the summary said.

• Email: jgowling@postmedia.com

Source Link

Related Posts