Home Markets Election deniers advanced to November elections in 27 states, the report said

Election deniers advanced to November elections in 27 states, the report said

by SuperiorInvest

Candidates who deny the results of the 2020 election have advanced to the November ballot in statewide races for positions to oversee, advocate or confirm elections in more than half of the states, according to a nonpartisan group that monitors the races.

In races in 27 states for governor, Attorney General and Secretary of Statethere will be at least one election-rejecting candidate on the ballot who is an echo of the former president Donald TrumpContinuing false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him, according to a report released by States United Action, which has been closely monitoring the progress of election denialists during the 2022 primary season.

NBC News obtained the report ahead of its release this week.

Many of the general election contests will be competitive races in critical battleground states — among them Arizona, Pennsylvania, Nevada and Michigan — the results of which could have a huge impact on the outcome of the next presidential election in those states.

“The stakes are really high in terms of what’s next in 2024,” said States United Action CEO Joanna Lydgate, “with a worst-case scenario [being] that we will see elections [result] it does not represent the will of the American electorate, which is especially troubling when we have close election results.”

According to the latest report from the group “Replacing the Refs” — the last to document the overall progress made by election denialists running for governor, attorney general and secretary of state during the primary season — at least 43 election denialists ran for governor, secretary of state or general prosecutor will advance to November elections in 27 states. (The final version of the group includes results from Tuesday’s final round of primaries in New Hampshire, Delaware and Rhode Island.)

In three states — Arizona, Michigan and Alabama — election denialists are slated to appear on the general election ballot in races for all three jobs. The first two are among the states where President Joe Biden achieved his narrowest victory in 2020.

In Arizona, Republican candidates for the three highest statewide offices that administer, advocate for, and oversee elections (Lake Kariwho is running for governor; by Mark Finch, who is running for Secretary of State; and Abraham Hamadehwho is running for Attorney General) all questioned Biden’s presidential victory or falsely said that the election was directly stolen from Trump.

In Michigan, Republican candidates for the same offices — Tudor Dixon for governor, Matthew DePerno for attorney general and Kristina Karamo for secretary of state — said the election was stolen.

Opponents running for governor will be on the November ballot in 18 states, while others running for attorney general will be on the fall ballot in 10 states, and opt-out candidates advanced to state primaries in 12, a United Action analysis found.

Candidates who have challenged the legitimacy of the 2020 elections in their states have advanced in recent weeks to the November election in Maryland (GOP gubernatorial and attorney general candidates Dan Cox and Michael Peroutka), Wisconsin (GOP gubernatorial candidate Tim Michels) and Massachusetts (GOP candidates for governor and secretary of state Geoff Diehl and Rayla Campbell).

Voters have also advanced this year in key battleground states like Pennsylvania and Nevada.

The Republican candidate for the governor in Pennsylvania, Doug Mastriano, has only doubled on his false claims about the 2020 election. Pennsylvania’s governor can appoint a secretary of state, meaning the top race has an especially powerful shot at the future of honoring the election results there.

Republican candidate for Secretary of State in Nevada, Jim Marchant, he said he would not certify the results for 2020. In the decisive swing state since the race, efforts have persisted among Trump allies to overturn the last presidential election.

“We don’t know what it’s like [general election] races will be successful, but even a single suffragette to win office in a single state is a five-alarm fire that threatens our democracy,” Lydgate said.

Implications for 2024

If elected, such candidates would have the power to oversee, administer, advocate or confirm elections — even in 2024, when Trump could seek re-election.

Even if these candidates falsely claimed that Trump won the 2020 election or questioned the legitimacy of Biden’s victory, their remarks do not necessarily predict what any of them would do in office in 2024. But experts say their remarks indicate that they could use their offices to contribute to an even more powerful effort to subvert the next presidential election.

“While all of these officials are required to act in accordance with applicable state and election laws, there is still a significant amount of discretion that senior officials, such as secretaries of state, have in how elections are conducted,” Elections said. expert Rick Pildes, professor of law at New York University School of Law. “And even without breaking the law, the concern is that officials will use that discretion in a way that makes it harder for eligible voters to vote.”

Pildes also said a “much more dangerous scenario to be concerned about” would be if the secretary of state, attorney general or governor refused to recognize the election results, claiming “there was something flawed in the process.”

Secretaries of State in most states oversee the state offices that administer all elections, but two other positions also have enormous power when it comes to elections.

Attorneys General can initiate or defend against election litigation that may ultimately affect how and which votes are or are not counted—such as lawsuits seeking to include or challenge ballots. They also provide legal advice to election officials on how to interpret state policies governing elections and maintain prosecutorial powers for election fraud, voter intimidation and other potential election crimes.

And without definitive action by Congress to reform the law on electoral numbersthe governors continue have the ability to exploit ambiguities in law to ensure that favored candidates succeed. (For example, if the governor were to recognize what critics call “bogus” voters as legitimate, Congress would have to count them under several conceivable scenarios. Dozens of such “bogus voters” in the five swing states that Biden won appeared during the 2020, although no governor has endorsed any of the contending candidates and Vice President Mike Pence, presiding over the count, has declined to endorse them.)

“Obviously, if any such official acted illegally, one would hope that the courts would overturn those actions,” Pildes said. “Even so, it would introduce great instability into the electoral process, question electoral legitimacy and probably prolong the resolution of the election – all of which are harmful in themselves.”

Source Link

Related Posts

%d bloggers like this: