The long -standing debate about the XRP price It is still a strong discussion. In a recent publication on the social media platform X, Fintech analyst Armando Pantoja argued that the notion of market capitalization that limits the increase of XRP to $ 1,000 is fundamentally defective. His comment came along with a brief video clip in which he draws comparisons between crypto and early technology technology such as Microsoft.
Why market capitalization does not limit technology
In your video, Pantoja ruled out the idea Among many investors, XRP market capitalization should be used as a rigid barrier against the appreciation of long -term prices at the price level of $ 1,000. He pointed out that while the technical analysis can be useful in the short term, it becomes less relevant when evaluating the potential of a token for a prolonged period.
Related reading
To take his point home, he invoked a hypothetical scenario of the early 1990s, asking spectators to imagine those who doubted Microsoft’s growth due to their market capitalization. He suggested that this type of logic would have lost the mass of mass adoption driven by Microsoft.
Pantoja insisted that the application of assessment metrics of the cryptography stock market leads to misunderstandings, especially because tokens such as XRP are more similar to technologies than companies. “Market capitalization is always too high. What does it matter? It is the technology that will be adopted independently,” he said.
This means that XRP is expected to follow a different trajectory, one more based on the use of the network, utility and Integration into global systems. This, in turn, would see a greater demand for XRP and cause its price to shudder at $ 1,000.
Community reactions: XRP fighting with impulse
It is easy to point out the mathematical implications of XRP that reaches $ 1,000, an assessment that will place its market limit in the tens of billion. However, supporters such as Pantoja accountant that such thought is based on obsolete comparisons.
Related reading
As such, it is not surprising that Pantoja’s publication has resonated within the XRP community, especially among those who believe that Token has much more space to grow than conventional narratives allow. However, the post also attracted some dissidents of those who believe that price projection can be too high.
Instead of focusing on the circulating figures of market supply or capitalization, Pantoja argued that the long -term XRP assessment will depend on the adoption of the real world of its underlying technology. XRP, through your Cross -border caseWithout a doubt, it will earn a lot of traction Between banks and institutionsEspecially once the Sec-Ripple demand is finally over.
Interestingly, the target price of $ 1,000 is more a general consensus among some other cryptographic analysts. Barric, a cryptographic commentator, Also published in The social media platform X that there is a clear path for XRP to move first through $ 4, then $ 10 to $ 20, exceed $ 100 and finally reach $ 1,000. He frames it as a several stages trajectory based on institutional adoption and XRP infrastructure role in transverse transmission payments.
Dom Kwok, former Goldman Sachs analyst and co -founder of Easya, long -term objectives Stretching up to $ 1,000 by 2030, also depending on mass adoption. Anders, another XRP proponent, also floated $ 1,000 As a possible long -term roof Compared to Bitcoin’s potential to achieve the target of $ 1 million.
Getty Images’s prominent image, Record of TrainingView.com
