The biggest threat to the US dollar may not be China, but the coverage flows of $ 30 whales

Listen, listen: He is going down.

Investors love to attach an Ex Post narrative to any price action, and this time the fault was in Trump’s erratic policies, the reduced attraction of US assets and the “Chinese spill.” Two of these really make sense (you can easily guess which ones).

But there is a much larger catalyst for the USD to sell more: FX Sobing flows from the appropriate “whales”.

These whales control $ 30 billion (!) In assets called in USDof which 13 billions in shares and the remaining portion in fixed income instruments.

You can know these whales by their common names: GPIF, Norges Fund, CPPIB, APG, Jubnatary …

Foreign pension funds, insurance companies and asset administrators are the true whales that could throw more US dollars in an attempt to correct its ” underlying ” considerable and secular risk of USD:

In this article, I will try to explain why these FX (sell USD) coverage flows could be activated, quantify how large these flows could be and evaluate which countries and coins could represent most.

The analytical process requires that we identify how big your USD assets (in % of its national economy) and quantors are.

But first, why does foreign whales actually “upload” their exposure to USD risk?

Imagine that you are the CPPIB, the largest pension fund in Canada with $ 500 billion+ in AUM.

It must generate a constant performance of ~ 6-7% to be able to attend their liabilities (future pensions), which means that it will invest in a portfolio of actions, bonds, real estate and alternatives.

Your responsibilities are in Cad (As the Pensions to Canadians will pay) but their assets can not only be called by CAD because to meet their investment needs, the US stock markets, $- coverage funds called,

Treasury, etc.. But investing in assets called in USD, It is also implicitly obtaining risk exposure.

So how much risk of USD must cover? Or know, how much USD/COD should you sell as a hedge?

The previous study of Schroeders Details the standard industry approach: the upper table analyzes the correlation between USDXXX (for example, USD/CAD) and its investment assets class (for example, shares).

Recently, the USD has recovered “always” when the stocks were sold As the world haste Being “undercondid” was great.

In addition, given a currency such as CAD (table below) is the merchandise/cyclic risk, during the sales of shares that have an active exposure of USD/CAD ” ” ” ” ”

But what happens when the USD does not join (!) During risk environments, exactly how we are recently witnessing?

In that case, being subconscious (= actively long USD) becomes painful since it runs out negatively along with the actions (and perhaps also the links) lose value.

And that was when these foreign whales would be forced to cover and initiate a substantial process of Forsal USD.

We cave in the data and discover:

A) How big could these USD sales flows be?

B) What coins would be more involved and why

***

Discharge of responsibility: This article was originally published in Macro Compass. Join this vibrant Macro Investor Community, Assets of Assets and Coverage Funds; See what subscription level it suits you most using this link.