President Trump suggested on Friday that he was open to abruptly reduce the tariffs that the United States had imposed on China, since US and Chinese negotiators prepare to meet in Switzerland this weekend to see high -risk commercial conversations.
Commercial tensions between the United States and China have discarded international markets and the global economy. Negotiations on Saturday and Sunday are destined to discourage the situation and help prepare the scenario for a broader commercial pact between the two economic superpowers.
In a publication on social networks, Trump said an 80 percent tariff about China “seems correct”, adding that it would be “for Scott B”, an apparent reference to the Treasury Secretary, Scott Besent.
A rate of 80 percent would be a great fall of the current 145 percent that Trump imposed on Chinese imports in recent months. But that high to high level would still turn off the majority of trade between countries. The Chinese data published on Friday showed shipments from that country to the United States fell 21 percent in April since the same period of the previous year.
The White House Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, said Friday afternoon that the 80 percent figure was one that Trump “launched” and that a reduction would only occur as part of a negotiation.
“The president still remains with his position that he will not generate tariffs unilaterally about China,” Leavitt said. “We need to see their concessions too.”
Nor is it clear if the conversations will lead to a short -term resolution for two governments that have serious economic disputes and have taken a hard tone towards the other in recent months.
The Trump administration has been running to reach commercial agreements with other countries before a self -imposed deadline for additional tariffs to remain in force in most commercial partners. But it has remained in a confrontation with China, which is already subject to a minimum rate of 145 percent in all imports.
This week, the two parties agreed to celebrate meetings in Geneva that will include Mr. Besent; Jamieson Greer, the United States commercial representative; And he Lifeng, the Vice Prize of China for economic policy.
Stock markets in the United States opened more on Friday after Trump expressed their willingness to reduce tariffs and said in a separate position that many commercial agreements were “in the hopper.” On Thursday, Trump highlighted a new preliminary economic pact with Great Britain as evidence that its tariff strategy is working.
The recent elevation of Mr. Besent, who is seen as a pragmatic in commerce, to lead conversations with China has also helped to calm the markets. The Secretary of the Treasury has argued that the rates and commercial restrictions that the United States and China have collected are “unsustainable” and urged Beijing to begin conversations to address what the Trump administration sees as unfair commercial practices.
Despite Mr. Trump’s greatest flexibility signs, an 80 percent tariff may not be low enough to restart business throughout the Pacific.
Although it differs from one company to another, some executives have said that tariffs greater than 50 percent are sufficient to freeze exports to the United States. Companies that cannot find an alternative supply source for their products outside of China face the perspective of bankruptcy and layoffs as summer yields and even 25 percent of tariffs can be paralyzed.
Speaking at the global conference of the Milken Institute in Los Angeles this week, Jane Fraser, executive director of Citigroup, said that companies could withstand lower tariffs, although commercial uncertainty had forced them to stop investment and hiring.
“If it is 10 percent, most of the customers we talk with say: ‘Yes, we can absorb that,” he said. “If it’s 25 percent, not so much.”
Economists have warned that the possibilities of a recession in the United States are increasing due to Trump tariffs. Last month, the International Monetary Fund reduced its perspective for the United States and global production.
While some companies have begun to increase their prices as a result of taxes, the effects of Trump tariffs have not yet been so obvious to US consumers. This is because it has been sending articles to the United States for many weeks from China by Mar, and because companies have stored generous amounts of inventory ahead of rates that enter into force.
But as trade between the United States and China remains paralyzed, these effects begin to worsen and become more evident, in the form of higher and more scarce prices.
“Companies know what happened,” said Ryan Peterson, executive director of Flexport, a logistics company. “Your business models are under a lot of pressure.”
The more time the United States waited to make changes in tariffs, he added: “The more severe the clash will be.”
It is not clear how Beijing will receive the change in tone from Mr. Trump. After weeks of refusing to “kneel” to the demands of the United States, China said he had decided to come to the table due to “global expectations, interests of China and the calls of the US industry and consumers.”
But it has also reached a challenging tone. “We are not afraid,” said Hua Chunying, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs, to journalists on Friday during a trip to the China field. “We don’t want any war with any country. But we have to face reality,” he said, according to a Reuters report.
The Chinese government has not confirmed who more will be with Mr. He in conversations with US officials. But Wang Xiaohong, Minister of Public Security of China, was traveling with Mr. He in Switzerland, according to a source that agreed to speak on condition of anonymity. Any negotiation on Fentanyl would be directed by Mr. Wang, who is also the director of the China Narcotics Control Commission.
The conversations “seem more efforts to investigate the positions of the other party,” said Ja-Aian Chong, associate professor of Political Science at the National University of Singapore. The Chinese side can say that it is willing to make concessions in areas such as balance the commercial surplus of the country, or helping to stop the export of precursors for fentanyl.
“I have doubts that something concrete leaves this next set of meetings,” Chong added.
But the Trump administration has been under pressure to show progress in commercial conversations after weeks of volatility in the markets and the growing fears in Wall Street and in the corporate America of a recession.
“Everything that has been happening with the meeting in Switzerland is very promising for us,” said Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council of the White House, in CNBC on Friday. “We are seeing collegiality and also sketches of positive developments.”
Trump said in the White House this week that he expected the conversations with China to be substantive. But analysts have mild their optimism about rapid advance because China generally prefers to participate in extended and formal negotiations. In addition to tariff reductions, a more specific list of requirements on both sides is expected for a comprehensive agreement.
Despite the affinity of Mr. Trump for imposing tariffs, in a separate publication on Truth Social on Friday, he presented the case of open markets and asked China to expand access to US companies.
“China should open their market to the US. – It would be so good for them! The closed markets no longer work!” Mr. Trump wrote.
Tony Romm Contributed reports.
